Oct. 7, 2022

601: Nuclear Energy & the Future Nuclear-Based Power - Nuclear Solutions for Energy Independence & Planetary Prosperity

Nuclear energy is one of the most controversial energy sources in modern society. Supporters claim it's clean and cheap, while detractors point to safety concerns and nuclear waste as reasons why it should be phased out. But what do we actually know about nuclear energy?


On today's episode, we're going back into the archives as we listen to my conversation with Mark Schneider on the future of nuclear energy.

 

Nuclear energy is one of the most controversial energy sources in modern society. Supporters claim it's clean and cheap, while detractors point to safety concerns and nuclear waste as reasons why it should be phased out. But what do we actually know about nuclear energy? Is there a future for it? And what are some alternatives that might help us achieve a cleaner, more sustainable world?

 

Original Show Notes (July 2021):

 

Many people are turning away from conventional power, and opting for sustainable solutions. Nuclear power plants may not be spiking headlines, but they are being eyed as a viable option for the future.

 

The future of nuclear energy production is in strong hands because unlike many other aspects of life, nuclear power is an option that will ALWAYS be needed.

 

Mark Schneider joins the program to help show how the advancements in nuclear energy have created solutions that answer the questions of climate change, energy independence, and planetary prosperity.

 

But what about the common objections we hear about nuclear energy?

 

Are nuclear power plants safe? Are nuclear power plants efficient? Are nuclear power plants bad for the environment? Can nuclear waste be recycled?

 

Mark answers and overcomes all those objections (and more) on today's information-packed episode of The Brian Nichols Show!

 

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Studio SponsorStratus ip: Don't let cyber attacks or old technology slow your company down. Learn more at Stratusip.net or schedule a consultation at briannicholsshow.com/stratusip

Stratus ip - Business Technology - Simplified



Support our Sponsors!

Support the program with a one-time donation or join our Patreon!

Take our audience survey for a chance to win a "Don't Hurt People, Don't Take Their Stuff" bumper sticker! 

 

 

Transcript

Brian Nichols  0:00  
Instead of focusing on winning arguments, we're teaching the basic fundamentals of sales and marketing and how we can use them to win in the world of politics, teaching you how to meet people where they're at on the issues they care about. Welcome to The Brian Nichols Show. So, that being said, I'm gonna snow Mark Schneider here on The Brian Nichols Show. Absolutely, Mark, we're talking about nucular energy today. And this is a topic I've been getting just tons of people saying, Brian, please can we can we do an episode focusing on nuclear energy? I've had Alex Epstein on the program. He did his moral case for fossil fuels where we actually we looked at a little bit of nucular energy we talked about I'm not sure if you're familiar over on Netflix, Zac Efron did his down to Earth series where he traveled all around the globe. And His first stop was to I forget the type of planet was but it was funny cuz we didn't even talk about nucular in the episode. And Zac Efron's dad is a nuclear scientist. And as an Alex pointed that that was a little weird omission in the conversation, they're talking about alternative forms of energy. But yes, nuclear energy. I've heard this brought up time and again, Brian need to have somebody in the show to talk about the value of nuclear energy going forward. And really, to show if people aren't really talking about it, they're not really serious in the conversation for renewable energy going forward. So with that being said, Mark, introduce yourself to the program. And what got you so fascinated that you want to talk about nuclear energy here on a libertarian ish podcast? Hey, folks, happy Friday, really quick want to go ahead and give a shout out to one of our awesome sponsors here at The Brian Nichols Show. And that is right strategies now. Whether you are someone who's looking to amplify your message where your voters are or where your customers are, don't worry, look no further right strategy specializes in the unique challenges of both running political campaigns and running a small business in the digital landscape with a proven track record of helping clients win elections and grow their businesses using smart strategic digital marketing. Right strategies is going to be the perfect partner to help you reach your goals. And their awesome team of experts is going to help you save time and money while helping you amplify your message to help win your elections and also win in the marketplace. Also, race stretches his really great SMS texting feature which will help you receive an efficient, affordable and smart way to focus your marketing budget by helping you reach 1000s of voters and customers right strategy is going to help you make a powerful impact on the outcome of your elections and your business growth. from social media management to expert graphic design work to marketing your product or campaign or heck, even building your brand, right strategies can put together a plan that makes sense for your goals, and do so with a budget that makes sense. So if you want to learn how right strategies can help you win your elections or help you grow your business head, the Brian Nichols show.com. And guess what you can get a free political campaign or marketing plan report card from Morgan and her team over at right strategies. Just do me a favor, make sure you let her know that I sent you one more time Brian Nichols show.com forward slash Rs, amplifying your message where voters and customers spend their time. And now back to our conversation with Mark Schneider.

Mark Schneider  3:08  
All right, so So I spent 23 years in the nuclear industry. I served in the Navy on worked on both submarines and aircraft carriers. And then I did three years working for Dominion energy. And now it's just kind of a hobby, I promote, you know, nuclear energy. So that's kind of the quick background on myself out as an operator, you go through lots and lots of training on how nuclear physics works and all that. But the big thing that really started fascinating me and my wife is also nuclear engineer, we have the nerdiest pillow talk on the planet. But it's good. She's way smarter than me. But you know, we started we're talking and communicate and discuss things about, you know, the advanced reactor design systems, right. And so really, for, you know, fun and entertainment, I did a bunch of research and learning about these, these advanced designs and how they operate. And some of them are super, super fascinating and super cool. And I like I'm going to bring it right up from the beginning, because it's a super awesome design and that's the the Aurora which is by a company called Oklo. This reactor went into licensing licensing process. On March 11 2020. It's a three year licensing process. Federal regulation requires a three year time period, it's arbitrary, it just is, but it is it's gonna run on spent nuclear fuel or nuclear waste, as everyone likes to call it from EBR to which was a test reactor back in the 1960s that operated into the 80s. So we got to react a new brand new reactor design. It's it's a it's a micro reactor, meaning it's small, it's gonna be built in the factory. So you build most of the components and factories, put it you do most of your testing, bringing together the final site. Assemble modules, do your final testing And then bring the reactor online, which is going to reduce the construction costs and construction times, the nuclear industry is actually really good at this. If you look behind you see USS Washington, that's a version of a modular reactor that's new, a nuclear powered submarine. And we build them in a factory that US is turning out a nuclear reactor every six months that way. So, you know, we have the capability of it, but it's primarily on the shipbuilding side. So we can do this, you know, land base size, the Aurora is a 1.5 megawatt reactor, that's about 1000 homes. And it fits on a quarter acre lot, quarter acre lot, your standard lot of for a home, right, just a standard suburban home is on about out on a quarter acre. But the big thing with nuclear energy is nuclear energy does not produce co2. If you're concerned about carbon emissions, or as a greenhouse gas and causing global warming, then this solves that nuclear energy producers, by the way, 20% of the power in the United States, and it produces about 10% of the power worldwide. But this new reactor is an advanced design that no one has really, you know, thought about as far as going into this small with nuclear, for the purposes of you know, producing power. But, you know, these things are designed to basically fuel them once every 20 years. So you put a you know, new reactor core in every 20 years. And that's a relatively simple process with the Aurora reactor design.

And that's one of the it's really fascinating. But the big thing when you talk nuclear energy, I do like to talk about the impact that nuclear has had with renewables. So in 2009, California decided to shut down. It's called songs to send over nuclear generating station down. It was just north of San San Diego, the Southern California area. And that's the debt the year that the rolling blackouts began in California every summer. And then now we see right now that Governor Cuomo and the mayor of New York City are talking about how New Yorkers need to conserve their electricity in the summer because they're about to have to, or they're going to have to go into rolling blackouts. Well, literally, two months ago, they shut down Indian Point, nuclear power generating station. So every time we see we shut down nuclear, you see the fact that renewables can't keep up. So they have to, you know, this use rolling blackouts or that to quit switch over to fossils. And a lot of cases, it's both, when New York shut down Indian Point, their carbon emissions spiked by 35%. overnight. So that's one of those crazy things when you look at it that we know nuclear is carbon free. And we have evidence of it. And you know, so we know it can and but the big thing is getting to the future, but how do we go from these large scale reactors that take a decade to build on to, you know, how quickly can we build these and when you get into modular construction, that's probably the best way to get there.

Brian Nichols  8:11  
Wow, that's a lot of notes. To start off, I might. So usually in my paper I have here for my trusty notes, when I'm going through and trying to recap episodes and to stay up to date with what we're talking about is it's usually gonna take about 25 minutes to fill a page. I think I have a full page right now in the first five minutes. So that's impressive, because you're going through and let's kind of start off here from how we approach things the program through the sales based lens, right solutions-based selling particularly and in this in this really way you've outlined what nucular is and the impact that nucular has already and then showing the impact that we know nucular can have and you're starting to touch on a lot of what I say a lot of us a really number one, the number one objection I've seen about nucular is the safety of nucular, particularly in the waste of nuclear not only does this Aurora from Okuu run on nuclear waste, but it lasts for 20 years.

Mark Schneider  9:09  
That's like fascinating. That's

Brian Nichols  9:11  
incredible that that the technology is to the point now, where one of the main objections that I remember hearing is now being resoundingly answered. So I'd say number one, that's a great way to overcome that objection. But let's be real market, there's going to be folks out there who are going to be fighting tooth and nail against nucular. So what are some of those common attacks that you hear from folks who say no, nucular is not the way to go? What's their argument?

Mark Schneider  9:34  
There are since the arguments usually come into nouns and those tickets to nouns and it's Chernobyl and Fukushima because of the accidents Chernobyl was terrible killed 51 people you have the area prevent that is now an exclusion zone. Fukushima we melted down three reactors destroyed a total of four. And I say we because I own that as part of the industry right? I use we in this and that I'm gonna Oh, my failures. But we have to look at it. Those were 1960s designed reactors. And Chernobyl is the big one. What about Chernobyl as well, Chernobyl didn't have a containment structure. So the containment if had one, it would work, this design would have kept the, you know, the explosion that occurred because they had a steam explosion. And then with Fukushima, if we let the heat up, if we didn't let the operators have at TEPCO, the Tokyo Electric Power Company, if we let them actually do their job, and not require the government to say yes to a bunch of things, those reactors wouldn't have exploded.

Brian Nichols  10:35  
Timeout. Explain that. I'm curious, what do you mean, the government not letting them do their jobs? What did the government do and Fukushima, they're not letting them do their jobs that could have prevented it. So

Mark Schneider  10:45  
when in the United States, the shift manager can release radioactive gases into the atmosphere, because they have the health and safety of the public at the forefront. They don't ask permission, they're going to do it. And the government is going to respond based on the way the plant operates. That's how the US does it. In Japan, in order to do that, they have to get permission from government entities. And so they didn't get the permission to events off the gas. And because the reactor was generating a bunch of hydrogen gas, it builds up and you basically had four little mini Hindenburg, actually, macro Hindenburg explosions. Right? So you have four hydrogen gas explosions,

Brian Nichols  11:25  
casual, no big deal. Thanks, government. Isn't government great. So I didn't even have to train thought I thought that was important to make sure we focused on

Mark Schneider  11:32  
that's great. And then the other government intervention with with both those events is that, you know, they have this forced evacuations, right, they have got themselves and the public so afraid of radiation, that you can't be anywhere near radiation is bad. Radiation is bad. But there's a band, there's actual studies that say that you don't get enough radiation, you will actually die of cancer at higher rates than people who do receive radiation. Right? Your body has to develop a defense mechanisms against those cancer cells that are produced in your body used, don't you have to find that right band? And I'll tell you, the airline industry actually has higher rates of cancer due to radiation exposure than the nuclear industry does. Because pilots fly they get a lot of solar radiation. So but it's natural, right? We always hear well, it's natural, it's natural. Well, you know what Cyanide is natural to but I'm not going to go around, you know, inhaling a bunch of cyanide. Right? So we have to understand that just because it's natural doesn't mean it's good for you. So an understanding of the different aspects, you know, of how radiation works, not bad gone way into my train of thought. So I want to steering backward. Yeah,

Brian Nichols  12:46  
yeah, no, no. So we'll we'll go back, because the common objections, right, you start to touch on the first being Chernobyl, Fukushima. So those being tossed out, and then you start talking about more, the radiation being bad. What other objections do you see going through the the industry in terms of people standing against nuclear energy?

Mark Schneider  13:05  
So the other one is, is cost. And we've already discussed that with the modular construction, right? So once you get modular construction, it drops the price. And we know it drops the price. We've seen it in the industry. It's just no one wants to listen to the fact that we do it on submarines all the time. And then the big one, like we talked about is the waste, and a lot of people because the waste lasts a long time. Right? But it's highly controlled nuclear waste has killed exactly zero people on planet Earth, right? And people don't realize that you can walk up to a, you could go up to the the Trojan power station, what's left of it, right, Trojans shut down in the 90s. And they're literally all that's left is the switchyard. And the casks that contain the nuclear waste the spent nuclear fuel that Oklo can run on, and he could walk up and hug those things and no problem, right? It's what you get, you got to pull these things apart, they're difficult to pull apart. You know, so and the ways to get talked about terrorism. And I'm like, you know, what, if I'm a terrorist, I'm not going to a nuclear site to get the waste. I'm going to a hospital to get radiation therapy treatments, right. radiotherapy treatments, because there's less security, it's easier to handle. It's portable. It's designed to be portable. Nuclear Waste is not designed to be portable. It's designed to be the opposite of portable. So that's the other thing and the other is that what's going to stack up the quantity of it. So again, we talked about times, you know, how big they are or how much waste they generate. We haven't talked about the fuel density, right? A gummy bear of uranium contains as much energy as a tonne of coal. Right so giant mound of coal like like three rail cars worth of coal, it and I might have the numbers off here is equal to one gummy bear your lifetime in a traditional nuclear reactor can be powered off of one so The cans worth of uranium. But if we switch to advanced reactor designs, you can power 20 lifetimes off of that one soda can of uranium because we're using all the energy instead of just 5% of the energy. So it's very dense. When you look at that submarine behind me, it operates for 33 years, and the nuclear waste from it will fit in a 55 gallon trashcan. So

Brian Nichols  15:30  
Oh, yeah. Interesting. Okay, so now folks, we've heard we have the product, it is new killer to the problem that we see folks out there. Number one energy, the energy crisis number two, climate change. So let's focus on those problems right now. Right, we're offering the solution, we hear the objections. So now we know what to prepare for, to overcome them. So let's focus on the positive outcomes. We're selling this to your average person. They're a little weary of nuclear because they've heard these objections throughout all their life. Pretty much they've you know, they've watched the documentaries of the mutants from from Chernobyl right wasn't a documentary or a mockumentary? That's right. Yeah. So yeah, so so when you're, you're selling to folks, it's I would always argue it's important to help show that better future so it's hard. Let's give you the magic wand. You're you're helping us sell this to your average person. What would that magic future look like? For folks, if we did embrace this as a solution? In the world of wine, there are so many choices, and that's why blood of tyrants wind as tyrants losing their heads, whether you're looking for a new go to that home, or watching the press your friends at a party, a lot of times wine has you covered. And if you're trying to get rid of some pesky parents in your life, well, we've got that covered, too. And the Brian Nichols show.com forward slash wine and get $5 off your order. One more time, Brian Nichols show.com, forward slash wine freemen don't ask permission. So take a sip, you'll be glad you did.

Mark Schneider  16:53  
So that magic future would actually look a lot like France or Ontario, Canada. And they're very similar, right? In geographic size, not necessarily population, but also an energy mixture. Right. So France is 70%, nuclear, 25% hydro, and 5% others, and they have 5% carbon emissions in their electrical grid. Ontario's about equivalent to that. And when you compare that to Germany, which is, by the way, the most carbon emitting nation in Europe, which is basically embraced renewable energy, right? You can look and you can see the comparison between you can basically remove all this, you know, all these pollutes you're putting in the atmosphere from fossil fuels. But the other thing when you're looking at nuclear energy, is that nuclear energy actually has a great safety record. If you look at the amount of deaths per unit of energy, nuclear has the lowest except for solar farms. Right, and that's including Chernobyl bother screwed Chernobyl, it becomes the lowest by a longshot. And part of that is the way the industry works. You have a government regulator, and you know, we can there are pros and cons to using the government it is but you have a government regulator that baseless sits at the site, making sure that the operators are ensuring that the plant is following their safety protocols. They're using, you know, all the you know, meeting not just not just the nuclear aspect, but safety aspect, right. The number one killer of people in the wind, wind and solar industry are false, right? They're not wearing their proper safety gear, the unit the United Kingdom is killing a person a month off of wind turbines alone. Right. Whereas the nuclear industry it's you know, I don't like talking about the death rate because this is a scary thing. But the fact is nuclear industry strives to actually get that to zero, whereas wind and solar is death is ramping up in the United States. roofers, the roofing industry has seen a 15% increase in deaths due to rooftop solar installation. Right. So the fact is, is that when you look at wind and solar, they're not the same things that everyone wants to talk about. They're actually extremely dangerous, because they're not very regulated. They don't have someone going around and watching them do that. Because half the time you go to a wind farm, I have friends, they weren't they they got out of the Navy and went and worked in the wind, wind industry because the pay is great. But they're climbing up on these 300 600 foot tall wind turbines. By themselves. There's no one within miles of them. If they don't put their fall harness on. It's on them. But if you work in a nuclear plant, right, you've got other people around you and I haven't done it right. I had to wear a fall harness and you did not dare wear lock up a ladder that require or area that didn't require fall harness without having that on at a risk of losing your job. Right. So the fact is or getting as a company getting a fine by the regulator. Right. So the fact is, is the nuclear industry has embraced regulation to the point of ensuring that safety is paramount in, you know, the idea of producing energy.

Brian Nichols  20:26  
Can I play devil's advocate now about regulation? Because, back to your original point about the cost of regulation you use Japan specifically is that maybe a threat a looming threat, if we were to do our SWOT analysis of nucular energy, one of those threats coming down the road was as nuclear energy becomes more and more prevalent, that that would incentivize more regulation that could lead to more disasters like Fukushima.

Mark Schneider  20:51  
So when you look at the advanced the advances in reactor technologies that can be installed in current reactor systems, and we're testing the United States, the United States is testing this stuff, and Russia and China are testing a lot of these things. There are fuel designs that basically would have that if they weren't that exists today that are in the final phases of commercial testing, that if you went you put that fuel design into the reactors at Fukushima, like let somebody go back in time to, to march 10 2011. If you stuck all those that fuel into those reactors, they may have melted down because of a lock loss of coolant, but they would not have generated any hydrogen gas. So you would have not had the explosions. So just with technologies that we have today that are that are just almost down the line that are they're being installed, final phases to be mass used, and we're seeing an improved and safety and then leads to designs like the Aurora, the Aurora actually has safety features that prevents it from being able to melt down and the United States prove this with the the EBRT reactor actually, the EBRT reactor, they show that they can shut down gave it a worse than Fukushima scenario, it shut itself down once in a hot idle state and stayed there till they decided to bring it back online. So with when you change the designs of reactors, going away from water as you're cooling, you actually develop a better safety margin. And that's one of the big arguments, the anti, you know, advanced nuclear architect, well, but what about sodium? Sodium is explosive? And I'm like, Well, yeah, okay, liquid Sodium is explosive if it gets in contact with water. But you put nitrogen and blankets on these things. And it's really not, there's actually never been an issue of a sodium explosion at a nuclear power plant. And by the way, Russia operates several of these on their submarines, and they have large scale commercial reactors that operate using sodium COVID.

Brian Nichols  22:52  
You just haven't had them get tested against aliens? Have you mark,

Mark Schneider  22:57  
you know, aliens? Or I like to think of velociraptors with frickin laser beams on their forehead. Like that's, that's either way. Yeah, that's that's the big thing. You know, there's there's a famous article, this nuclear famous article talking about, you know, what happens if you were to, you know, breach a nuclear power plant, or trying to slim down to touch the, the, or what would happen to your body if you're swimming to the spent fuel pool where the where the spent fuel is, is stored until it's into long term storage. And it talks about the effects of the radiation. But the very last line of the article says, but don't worry, you wouldn't make it past the first two feet before your blood basically fill the top of the pool, as you were, you know, riddled with bullets from the security guards.

Brian Nichols  23:44  
Yeah, I will. So let's do this. We're wrapping up. We're, we've already painted the the better picture. But let's outline an objective timeline. Because I think this is where people sometimes are like, this sounds great. we'll ever see this actually happen. You're talking about the Aurora. It's actually out there. It's a product that is now going into production. We're seeing it being embraced. So what's the timeline look for this nucular Future Is this something we're gonna see? 510 15 years mark.

Mark Schneider  24:12  
So right now it's looking like spring of 2023 that Oklo should be breaking ground on their their first Aurora and Idaho in the spring of 2023. Also another company new scale, there's a more advanced design of a traditional reactors is modular, smaller than the current large scale reactors. And they've got a 12 unit facility that they're gonna break are also an Idaho they're going to break ground on as well right around that same timeframe. Wyoming is in the process of changing legislation, and working to with TerraPower to build a test reactor design there. There are three, three other government sites that are selected for advanced reactor design. means the Russians broke ground and are building a brand new fast reactor that's going to run on nuclear waste out. In the cuts and more of the central area of Russia, I don't know, specifically, the Chinese have several advanced designs that they are working on right now. So as a, you know, when you look at the timeline, this stuff is here now under construction, and it's rapidly coming to the forefront, we see lots and lots of companies that are pushing forward developing agreements. Last I heard new scale has agreements, like 12 different countries, to build nuclear reactors in nations like South Africa, Poland, Ukraine, United States, maybe Canada, maybe the United Kingdom. So they're, they're looking there, first of all, the unit facility is going to break ground, but they're looking in the next decade, potentially, like two to 300 of their 75 megawatt units. So Whoa,

Brian Nichols  26:00  
so really quick, what what just I know, we're getting short in time, but like, what is this going to look like? What will this do? I mean, is this gonna be like, if Tesla got his way in the early 1900s, like going forward, like the world would be, you know, floating cars right now? Is that kind of at the point where we're at? Where if we get this nuclear energy, changing the way that we look at energy, that, I mean, goodness, the sky's the limit?

Mark Schneider  26:24  
Yes, the sky's the limit. And when you're looking at the amount of energy that we have available to us, right, you know, everyone talks about, you know, how fuel is gonna run out and all that. So like, right now, I think there's enough in available Uranium reserves for like 80 years, that's without, you know, sourcing new uranium. And that's, that's just using our current light water reactor designs, right, you only use they use x 0.7% of the uranium. And so you multiply that times basically 130 or something like that. So now you've taken 80 times 130. And that's, you know, that's not even excluding what we have as other waste products. That is depleted uranium uses like tank bullets and stuff like that, and armor that we could then use as as fuel, and then you get into thorium, right, I'm gonna give you a little bit of touch on thorium so you don't get you know too much beat up on on that. But when you get into thorium, now we're, so we have like, at like, you know, centuries, we're probably in the 1000s of years. And then thorium extends it into like, you know, 10s of 1000s, if not hundreds of 1000s of years, potentially, we have up to a million years of viable energy on planet earth in the form of nuclear energy.

Brian Nichols  27:38  
Wow, that's pretty darn cool. Well, how about that, folks, that's a call to action right there ever heard one, explore this as a solution. And we have a million years worth of energy right here and good old planet Earth, you don't need to go to Mars or wherever it is that Elon is going to go in the future. So with that being said, Mark, obviously, we want to make sure we're able to continue this conversation with folks, because this is something that I'm excited to learn more about, especially as we are heading towards that time for Aurora 2023. That's right around the corner, folks, believe it or not less than a year and a half away. So with that being said, Mark, where can folks go ahead and follow you support the work you're doing? And obviously wanna go ahead and learn more?

Mark Schneider  28:18  
Yeah, so you can find me on Twitter, my Twitter handle is at sub Schneider as a sub is in submarine and my last name Schneider. I like to make it simple. Keep it simple, stupid. That's what they taught me in the Navy. So but yeah, that's, that's kind of the biggest thing. You know, and I just kind of advocate I, you know, I go in and out of advocating for just because I get busy in my life. I have six kids. I work full time. I'm going to college right now, too. So, you know, it's, you know, I've got a busy life. So sometimes I just gotta I can't I can't do this hobbies. As much

Brian Nichols  28:52  
as six kids. Yeah, you were busy. Don't get in there, Mark. Well, Mark, thank you so much. We'll make sure we include all your links there in the show notes, folks, if you want to go ahead and continue the conversation, head over the show notes. Click the links there. And of course, with that being said, Mark Schneider. Thanks for joining us on today's episode of The Brian Nichols Show.

Mark Schneider  29:10  
Thank you so much.

Unknown Speaker  29:11  
Thanks for listening to The Brian Nichols Show. Find more episodes at the Brian Nichols show.com

Brian Nichols  29:18  
Enjoying the audio version of the show, then you'll love our YouTube channel. Be sure to head over there and subscribe. If you're new to The Brian Nichols Show, be sure to head to your favorite podcast catcher and click download all unplayed episodes so you don't miss one of our nearly 500 episodes that will be sure to leave you educated, enlightened and informed if you got value from today's episode can do me a favor and head to the Brian Nichols show.com forward slash support and leave us a $5 donation and by the way, have you given the show a five star review yet? If not, head to Apple podcasts and tell folks why you listened to the program and don't forget to tell your friends to subscribe to follow me on social media at be Nichols liberty and again, if you'd be so kind please consider making a donation to The Brian Nichols Show at the Brian Nichols show.com forward slash support The Brian Nichols Show us Supported by viewers like you thank you to our patrons Darryl Schmitz Michael Lima Michel Mankiewicz Cody John's Trek the caster and the we're libertarians network

Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Mark Schneider Profile Photo

Mark Schneider

Nuclear Futurist

Mark Schneider is a nuclear futurist, a leading expert in emerging Gen IV Nuclear and the President of Gen IV Nuclear Inc. with over two decades of experience in the Nuclear Industry both in the United States Navy and as a commercial power plant operator.

Mark has a bachelor's degree in Nuclear Engineering Technology. He has utilised his skills from his past Nuclear experience to develop his ability to educate and train the public on the emerging Gen IV Nuclear Technologies. His experience is beyond just the operations of nuclear power plants but also how new technologies can be associated with nuclear power. His Green Nuclear Deal is the answer to Climate Change that answers both the environment and economical effects. Gen IV will make negative CO2 emissions technologies viable. The idea is to directly suck carbon dioxide out of the air. There are start-ups working on this now and Gen IV Nuclear will make this a viable technology for the future.